Who is Silvia?

“Who is Silvia, what is she … ?” Shakespeare inquired wistfully. Well, Sylvia is a final-year English literature undergraduate who formed part of a panel of ‘library users’ at the 2012 libraries@cambridge conference. Each panel member was asked what they want and need from libraries, now and in the future (rather to my regret: I’d have preferred a question like “What do you need to support your study and research?”). Sylvia’s contribution made me grin from ear to ear. She said,

… the training required to make use of a digital library, of the online resources available, has been woefully underestimated and provided for. Although our generation has been called digital natives, in fact, when it comes to making good use of the internet and its resources for our studies, the university has left a major gap. Of course, it’s possible to train oneself, but is this patchy approach really acceptable as digital resources become increasingly central to education?

It’s so empowering to hear a student arguing the case for formal support in digital and information literacy – particularly since of late I’ve come to the conclusion that information literacy is the dark matter of the scholarly endeavour: you can see its impact, and express theories about how it affects behaviour, but nobody in academia seems to be able to define exactly what it is. (For the record, the ANCIL definition is pretty straight-up.)

Like all elements of independent learning, information and digital literacies can’t be taught – or not at any rate within a traditional knowledge transmission framework:  they can only be learned – constructed and developed by the individual in reflective dialogue with his or her subject and his or her own creative perspective. But it’s equally important to realise, as Sylvia has, that this development cannot be left to chance or osmosis. Students need and deserve ongoing, scaffolded support that allows them to consider the circumstances and conventions within which they are practising, and to develop a conscious and reflective approach to engaging with information and information tools.

Cambridge needs to take more responsibility for making its students adept users of the digital resources available to them, even if – especially if – the academics themselves haven’t been taught these skills. And what better place to start than the library itself?

Bravo, Sylvia – and thank you.


Sylvia’s impressions of the conference in full can be found in the English Faculty Library Newsletter for Lent Term 2012.

Advertisements

1 comment so far

  1. Miss Crail on

    Oh, absolutely, absolutely.
    There was also Deborah Shorley saying at libraries@cambridge that we’ve got to somehow leapfrog the academics, be better at knowing how to find information, and also counteract the fairly common perception that [library-related-staff] are no longer of any use in passing skills on. A lot of us have no academic background in the subject area we now work with, which doesn’t help [though it does mercifully remove the temptation to sneak into the stacks to read the books]
    Worrying about this, plus a nagging quo vado? feeling after last October’s sessions in the Crail Memorial Infotheque, have led to many a gin-soaked and French-Fancy-stuffed thinkfest, with alas mostly blanks drawn. Same old, same old.
    I’ve said it before, and say it again, we need to get together on this particular subject, UL and outliers, so we can sing from the same hymnsheet in at least vaguely similar keys. Hope it is being considered.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: